How soon could US states outlaw abortions if Roe v Wade is

Wednesday, May 4, 2022
author picture Mia Chevalier
trends
Video/image source : youtube, theguardia
Original content created by news.limited staff

How Soon Could US States Outlaw Abortions If Roe V Wade Is Upheld?

According to the Guttmacher Institute‚ 26 US states are planning to ban abortion. Of those‚ nine already have pre-Roe bans‚ while 13 have trigger bans. North Carolina has a pre-Roe ban‚ though it's unclear whether the state will implement it in a timely manner. The Institute has outlined a few other reasons why abortions could become illegal without Roe v Wade.

Defending the right to abortion in the United States

Defending the right to abortion in the U.S. if Roe v Wade is upheld is a challenge to the constitutionality of laws prohibiting abortion. These laws‚ most commonly known as dilation and evacuation procedures‚ violate the right to an unborn child's life. In addition‚ the right to abortion is protected under the Fourteenth Amendment‚ which guarantees an individual's right to make decisions regarding their health. Pro-life groups claim that enacting laws that limit abortion will negatively affect poor women and the poor. In a survey by Pew Research Center‚ more than half of American adults believe that abortion should be legal in most cases. But pro-life groups have been vocal and have made gains in the reproductive rights fight over the past four decades. Defending the right to abortion in the United States if Roe v Wade is upheld is a critical way to protect this right. The Supreme Court may grant more latitude to the states in restricting and prohibiting abortion. Almost half of the states would likely adopt and enforce strict and unconstitutional abortion laws. This would create abortion deserts across the country. Thousands of women would need to travel to obtain legal abortion care‚ and millions more would find themselves unable to access it for a variety of reasons. Even if Roe is upheld‚ defending the right to abortion in the United States is a critical issue that requires a vigorous effort from everyone. The Supreme Court's decision has no constitutional foundation. It mentions specific Fourth Amendment rights related to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. But the decision fails to make the connection between abortion and these rights. It is a fundamental right to women. And that right extends to everyone‚ regardless of race‚ gender‚ or ethnicity. Defending the right to abortion in the United States if Roe v Wade is upheld would be a critical issue. The ruling is not the only issue in defending the right to abortion in the United States. Many states have restrictions on access to the procedure. Some require a judge or parental involvement to perform an abortion. Others require waiting periods between abortion clinic visits. These restrictions are particularly burdensome for women of low income. The pro-choice movement claims that these restrictions have a negative impact on poor women. While the Supreme Court's decision is not yet final‚ a leaked draft of the upcoming decision suggests that the court is on the verge of overturning Roe v Wade‚ which established the constitutional right to abortion in the U.S. During the first trimester. However‚ the new laws must not pose an undue burden on women‚ as they are subject to a challenge. Further‚ new regulations must also not be imposed without proving that these regulations are harmful to the rights of women.

Limiting access to abortion care in low-income areas

While Roe v Wade allows any woman to choose an abortion‚ some states are more tolerant than others‚ and some states may restrict access even if the case is not decided yet. A recent study has found that only three states have implemented laws that limit access to abortion. While the United States has a strong reproductive rights tradition‚ more than half of the world's women are poor‚ and long distance travel may prove too difficult for most women. Furthermore‚ states in low-income areas are more likely to ban abortion services‚ with many in the South‚ Midwest‚ and Great Plains. If Roe is upheld‚ certain states could align with countries that impose stricter restrictions on abortion‚ which would exacerbate the problem for these women. Fortunately‚ the ACLU has succeeded in forestalling funding bans in several key states‚ and more than 40% of Medicaid-eligible women receive abortion coverage. However‚ the chances of an enshrined ruling in Roe v Wade are bleak. This situation is exacerbated by the fact that many states currently require parental consent before providing abortion services. The report offers solutions to these issues‚ including civic engagement and funding for reproductive health services. To ensure access to abortion services‚ local law enforcement agencies and hospitals should be encouraged to support the bill as an essential medical service. Further‚ the report includes a glossary of terms related to abortion care. All of the laws cited are currently in effect or enacted in 2019. While the ruling in the case is likely to be overturned‚ the bans will still restrict access to the procedure. In Texas‚ the law would require a woman to travel 14 times further to obtain an abortion. The driving distance has risen to nearly 3.5 hours per woman. If the Supreme Court upholds Roe v Wade‚ some clinics may close within days or months. Several state legislatures are currently considering laws that could limit access to abortion care in low-income areas. These include bills that would prohibit Medicaid funding for abortion‚ as well as Hyde Amendments that prohibit federal money for abortion. The Hyde Amendment is a federal health care law that has been around since 1976. This law only makes exceptions for women who have had rape‚ incest‚ or have had an unplanned pregnancy. The Supreme Court's draft opinion on abortion could result in the end of the constitutional right to access an unplanned pregnancy. The court's conservative justices have already begun to draw conclusions from conservative critiques of Roe v. Wade‚ and some Republican-led state legislatures have already begun moving toward abortion restriction. If the decision is upheld‚ it could ban abortion in over half of the US‚ including California and New York.

Reasons why abortions would decline without Roe v Wade

There are many reasons why abortions would decline without Roe versus Wade. If Roe were overturned‚ abortions would be illegal in twenty-one states‚ the District of Columbia‚ and five U.S. territories. The Supreme Court's decision in 1973 established abortion as a fundamental right. Moreover‚ understanding abortion policy requires careful analysis of state constitutions and laws as well as legislative and access considerations. A significant change in the law would mean that legal abortions would drop by 14 percent. This is equivalent to about 100‚000 fewer abortions. There would be new clinics opening up along state lines‚ and some women could get illegal surgical abortions. The number of abortions in states with 100-mile distances or more from clinics would drop by 30 percent. However‚ if the court overturned Roe v. Wade‚ there would be fewer abortions overall. In the decade following the election of President Reagan‚ many people hoped the Supreme Court would overturn Roe v. Wade. However‚ in Planned Parenthood v. Casey‚ the Court affirmed that abortion was a fundamental liberty‚ and that a state could regulate it without affecting the right to choose. This decision has triggered a debate on abortion in the United States and around the world. Although Roe v. Wade was a major victory for abortion rights‚ it shifted the balance of power. In the United States‚ the court's ruling has undermined the rights of many Americans‚ especially women and minorities. It has also undermined the values of equality‚ impartial justice‚ and self-government. In addition‚ the decision makes abortion illegal in more than 35 states. This is a glaring blow to the rights of women and children. Moreover‚ the abortion right would become a state-by-state decision. A woman in Louisiana‚ for example‚ would have to drive 666 miles one way to obtain an abortion if she wanted it. At present‚ the average distance to an abortion provider in Louisiana is 37 miles. If Roe were overturned‚ the distance would be as large as 279 miles. Those states would be left with little choice but to seek the help of doctors who live in remote areas. Changing regulations to limit access to abortion pills has also led to the creation of a national crisis. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved medication abortion pills in December 2018. These laws would allow doctors to mail abortion pills to women in rural areas‚ easing the burden on women who cannot visit a clinic. Despite these restrictions‚ the Biden administration has proposed a constitutional amendment to re-examine this decision and provide stronger protection for women. However‚ the decision could still lead to a ban on the procedure‚ as it does in many states.